Living with AI Code Assistants: One Year Later
Copilot, Claude, GPT — I've been using AI assistants daily for a year. Here's what actually changed.
aiproductivitytools
One year ago, I was skeptical. "AI will never understand my codebase." Now I can't imagine coding without it.
What changed in my workflow
- Boilerplate is dead — scaffolding takes seconds
- Documentation is instant — "add JSDoc to this function"
- Debugging is conversational — paste error, get fix
- Learning accelerated — ask "why" instead of searching
What AI is bad at
- Architecture decisions — it follows patterns, doesn't create them
- Business logic — it doesn't know your domain
- Performance optimization — often suggests naive solutions
- Security — always review generated auth code
My current stack
- Claude — for complex reasoning and code review
- Copilot — for in-editor completions
- GPT-4 — for explaining concepts
The productivity paradox
Here's the thing: AI made me faster at writing code. But writing code was never the bottleneck. Understanding the problem was.
Advice for skeptics
Don't fight it. Learn to prompt well. Use it as a collaborator, not a replacement.
AI assistants are like having a very fast, very literal junior developer. Useful, but you're still the architect.